About The GLEN



Read More

Our Action-Learning Ecosystem

Read More

The GLEN Social Change Model

Read More

 GLEN Origins 


Read More

How Do We Work?

We are Guided by our Social Change Model . . .

. . . And Are Asking a Lot of Questions

These questions have been especially energizing to GLEN members. They are constantly evolving.

  • Mutual Support: What is required to stay grounded and hopeful in these times? How can we support each other through co-witnessing and holding space for ambiguity and uncertainty.?
  • World Crises Response: How are crises landing for us personally; what competencies do leaders need to face these crises; how can we form trusted collaborations to amplify emerging solutions?
  • Creating new trusted narratives: In a world that is socially constructing its realities, inventing new stories and interpretations is relatively easy. But how can we create new stories that are trustworthy and have real sustaining power? Are there universal archetypes underlying the variety of human interpretations? Can we identify principles and frameworks for collective action? What developmental capabilities are needed to hold differences in inclusive, respectful engagement? Working with collective shadows: How, in change work, can leaders both sense into and learn to work with unexamined and even taboo forces that can erupt when repressed or ignored?
  • Balancing inner development and outer structures: Change leaders need tools and knowledge that can be learned and practiced. But personhood is equally important. OD practitioners have long known that to be truly facilitative in settings with complex human dynamics, success often depends on one’s ability to be personally aware and reflective. How can both aspects be honored?
  • Blending virtual and face-to-face work: Remote work is ubiquitous, along with a vast array of tools that support it. How can practitioners blend these opportunities with traditional practice?
  • Dealing with complexity: Continually expanding levels of access to information, new techniques of interpretation, and social communication technologies are challenging everyone. What would Sensemaking 2.0 look like? How can we keep the dangers of over-simplification in mind? How do we balance larger system initiatives with local needs and cultures?

  • Keeping whole systems in mind while working on parts: Living systems have ways of adapting around single-point interventions. What is the role of leaders in this? How do generative images and visualization help in this process? What is the role of energetic and social fields?

  • Racism: What is our complicity in systemic racism? How do our sentiments about racism translate into action? What impacts might we have?
  • Working with unintended consequences: Systems respond inside and outside the range of human perception. Surprises seem to be increasing. How do we adapt and stay resilient?

  • Pairing visual with dialogic practice: We’ve discovered the complementarity of visual practice and dialogue as being hopeful and important when working with complex systems. Visuals allow people to see and explore the whole, while the dialogic approach allows understanding across differences. How can the two together allow for evocative narratives to emerge?

  • Supporting collaborative networks: We suspect that having clear collaboration infrastructures is necessary for collective impact. How are these created, and what should they look like?